Diyalog tamamlamaSoru #11482
Julian: I think high-speed rail should completely replace domestic short-haul flights between neighboring cities.
Claire: But wouldn't constructing extensive railway tracks across mountainous terrain take decades and bankrupt the transportation ministry?
Julian: ----
Claire: I see your point. Factoring in aviation carbon taxes and airport congestion costs makes rail far more economically and ecologically viable.
Claire: But wouldn't constructing extensive railway tracks across mountainous terrain take decades and bankrupt the transportation ministry?
Julian: ----
Claire: I see your point. Factoring in aviation carbon taxes and airport congestion costs makes rail far more economically and ecologically viable.
- A)While the initial capital expenditure is substantial, rail provides vastly higher passenger capacity with ninety percent lower carbon emissions per traveler.
- B)Trains are far more polluting than airplanes because diesel locomotives burn coal.
- C)Nobody travels between neighboring cities anyway, so both planes and trains are pointless.
- D)Mountains cannot be tunneled through with modern civil engineering machinery.
- E)We should eliminate all intercity transport and encourage citizens to walk everywhere.
Cevabı ve çözümü göster
Doğru cevap: A) While the initial capital expenditure is substantial, rail provides vastly higher passenger capacity with ninety percent lower carbon emissions per traveler.
Çözüm: Claire'in "aviation carbon taxes and airport congestion costs makes rail far more viable" tepkisi, Julian'ın yüksek yolcu kapasitesi ve %90 düşük karbon salınımı avantajını açıkladığını gösterir. Doğru cevap A'dır.